DGW Kramer LLP has launched a significant class-action lawsuit against Avant Gardner LLC and Alegria Enterprises Inc., in a bid to seek justice for the humiliation and trauma inflicted on the LGBTQ+ community. The case arises out of the Alegria Pride 2023 fetsival. The event was supposed to be a safe and joyful celebration of love and acceptance for the LGBTQ+ community.
DGW Kramer is proud to be a part of a movement to advocate for the AAPI community, representing individuals who experience discrimination in the tech industry such as Mr. Ben Huynh. An increasing number of Asian American professionals working in the tech industry are filing lawsuits against their companies, claiming they have been consistently denied
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 13, 2022, that Section 1782 discovery does not apply to private arbitration bodies. The Court’s unanimous decision held that “[t]he statute reaches only governmental or intergovernmental adjudicative bodies.” ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare. Section 1782 is a powerful statutory tool for overseas litigants — or intended litigants
On June 1, 2022, DGW Kramer prevailed in a complex commercial real estate litigation in the New York Supreme Court Kings County, establishing that the seller breached the contract and converted funds paid to them by the buyer. In a unanimous jury decision after about just 20 minutes of deliberation, the jury found for the plaintiffs on both causes
On May 17, 2022, DGW Kramer LLP won a jury trial in a financial crimes matter on behalf of clients who were defrauded by defendants who had promised to invest the funds paid to them by plaintiffs in a trust, but ended up pocketing the money paid for themselves. The lead trial attorney on the
BREAKING NEWS: The New York appellate court for the First Department has unanimously concluded that money judgments from China are recognizable in New York under the Uniform Foreign Money Judgments Recognition Act. This decision reverses the lower court’s erroneous order in the matter of Shanghai Yongrun Inv. Mgt. Co., Ltd. v Kashi Galaxy Venture Capital Co.,